The Ford EcoBoost V6 engine recall lawsuit centers on a class action filed against Ford Motor Company related to a manufacturing defect in the intake valves of certain 2021 and 2022 Ford and Lincoln models equipped with the 2.7-liter and 3.0-liter EcoBoost V6 engines. The faulty intake valves are prone to cracking and breaking due to a grinding burn defect incurred during production, which can lead to catastrophic engine failure, loss of vehicle power, and significant safety risks.
Background of the Recall and Defect
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a recall notice in 2024 for nearly 91,000 Ford and Lincoln vehicles, including the Ford F-150, Bronco, Explorer, Edge, as well as Lincoln Aviator and Nautilus models manufactured between 2021 and 2022. The recall warns that the intake valves in the EcoBoost V6 engines may have excessive hardness from thermal damage during manufacturing, leading to cracking at a critical valve groove. This valve failure can cause severe engine damage resulting in sudden loss of motive power and increased crash risk.
Details of the Lawsuit
- Plaintiffs: Vehicle owners Matthew Barkus and Dan Silberman, among others, filed the class action lawsuit after experiencing or fearing defects in their Ford EcoBoost V6 vehicles (F-150 and Bronco, respectively).
- Claims: The lawsuit alleges Ford failed to disclose the known defects before sale, causing purchasers to overpay for vehicles with defective engines. They seek more than $5 million in damages, citing violation of consumer protection laws like the Car Lemon Law.
- Ford’s Response: Ford acknowledged the defect, issued a recall with free inspections and engine replacements where needed, and offered reimbursements for prior repairs. However, plaintiffs argue Ford’s response was insufficient and delayed, and that the defect risks safety and vehicle value.
Impacted Vehicles
- Ford Bronco (2021–2022)
- Ford F-150 (2021–2022)
- Ford Explorer (2021–2022)
- Ford Edge (2021–2022)
- Lincoln Aviator (2021–2022)
- Lincoln Nautilus (2021–2022)
Legal and Safety Implications
The defect involves the “third keeper groove” on the intake valves, crucial for valve spring retention and rotation to prevent carbon buildup. Manufacturing flaws cause thermal damage that hardens the valve excessively, making it brittle and liable to crack. When valves fail, engines can suffer catastrophic damage suddenly, leading to power loss and potentially dangerous driving conditions.
The class action lawsuit highlights consumer outrage over missing or delayed warnings and concerns about the safety risk posed by the engine defect. It also raises questions about Ford’s timeliness and adequacy in addressing the fault, despite the recall and remediation effort. Plaintiffs emphasize their right to compensation for diminished vehicle value, out-of-pocket expenses, and potential safety hazards.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Ford EcoBoost V6 Recall Lawsuit
What is the defect in the EcoBoost V6 engines?
The intake valves have a manufacturing defect causing grinding burn damage which leads to cracks and potential valve breakage, risking total engine failure.
Which vehicles are affected?
Select 2021 and 2022 models of Ford Bronco, F-150, Explorer, Edge, and Lincoln Aviator and Nautilus equipped with 2.7L or 3.0L EcoBoost V6 engines.
What legal claims are plaintiffs making?
Plaintiffs claim Ford failed to disclose the defect, leading to overpayment and safety risks, seeking damages under consumer protection laws including the Lemon Law.
What remedies has Ford provided?
Ford issued a safety recall with free engine inspections and replacements and offers reimbursements for owners who previously paid for related repairs.
What are the risks if the valves fail?
Valve failure can cause sudden engine power loss, increasing the risk of crashes, and may lead to costly engine repairs or replacements.
Conclusion
The Ford EcoBoost V6 engine recall lawsuit underscores serious concerns over a manufacturing defect affecting dozens of thousands of vehicles with potential safety hazards. While Ford has initiated recall and repair programs, affected owners pursuing legal action argue the company’s previous nondisclosure and handling of the defect warrant compensation. As the case progresses, it will further illuminate automotive industry responsibilities for timely defect disclosure and the protection of consumer safety and rights.
