The North Myrtle Beach wakeboarding lawsuit involves a personal injury claim filed by a plaintiff against Shark Wake Park 843 and the City of North Myrtle Beach following a significant injury sustained on a wakeboarding course ride in 2024. The case highlights critical issues related to premises liability, safety measures, and operator negligence at water parks offering adventure recreational activities.
Background of the North Myrtle Beach Wakeboarding Lawsuit
On July 6, 2024, the plaintiff was a passenger on a wakeboarding course operated by Shark Wake Park 843 when he was unexpectedly struck in the head by an object, resulting in a fall into the water and subsequent severe injuries. The lawsuit alleges that the incident occurred due to unsafe conditions and a failure by the defendants to properly maintain the course or provide adequate warnings and safety protocols.
The plaintiff contends that after the injury, no employees or lifeguards responded to assist him, and he remained in distress until his brother intervened. The suit emphasizes the absence of required safety equipment, lifeguard staffing, and conspicuous warning signs on the premises.
Details of the Lawsuit Allegations or Claims
- Premises Liability and Unsafe Conditions: The wakeboarding course allegedly had latent defects making it significantly more dangerous than typical facilities and failed to meet applicable codes and safety standards.
- Lack of Proper Safety Personnel and Equipment: The defendants are accused of not maintaining the legally required ratio of lifeguards, failing to station lifeguards in towers, and not having safety or rescue equipment readily available.
- Failure to Warn: The lawsuit claims there were no signs warning customers of the dangerous conditions of the course.
- Negligent Hiring and Supervision: Operators were allegedly unfit or inadequately trained to ensure the safety of customers using the wakeboard course.
- Negligent Maintenance and Inspections: Defendants failed to conduct routine inspections and maintenance to prevent hazards.
Legal Claims and Relevant Laws Involved
The case primarily involves premises liability law, which holds property owners and operators responsible for maintaining safe conditions for invitees, such as paying customers. The plaintiff claims negligent design, maintenance, supervision, and failure to warn of known dangers. The doctrine of respondeat superior is invoked, holding the park and city liable for employees’ acts within the scope of employment.
Health, Financial, Social, or Industry Impacts of the Lawsuit
The plaintiff suffered significant bodily injury requiring extensive medical treatment, loss of enjoyment of life, and mental anguish. Financial damages include medical bills, lost wages, and future care costs. Socially, the lawsuit raises awareness about safety standards in recreational water sports and the importance of adequate safety staffing and hazard warnings.
Industry-wise, the case may compel water parks and recreational operators to review and enhance safety protocols, staff training, and emergency response readiness to mitigate liability and protect patrons.
Current Status and Recent Developments
The lawsuit was filed in Horry County Common Pleas Court in April 2025 and remains active. Discovery proceedings are ongoing, with investigations into safety compliance, employee training records, and incident reports. The plaintiff’s legal team is pursuing damages related to negligence, with the potential for trial or settlement.
Consumer Advice and Business Consequences Related to the Lawsuit
Visitors to water parks and adventure sports facilities should be aware of safety conditions and inquire about lifeguard presence and emergency procedures. Operators must rigorously comply with state regulations concerning lifeguard staffing, hazard warnings, and equipment maintenance to ensure customer safety and reduce litigation risks.
Conclusion: Significance and Future Outlook of the North Myrtle Beach Wakeboarding Lawsuit
The lawsuit underscores the critical responsibility of recreational operators to maintain safe environments and adequately protect their patrons. Its outcomes will likely influence regulatory standards and industry practices to prevent similar injuries. Ensuring a culture of safety and responsiveness is paramount in adventure sports to safeguard wellbeing and legal compliance.
