Cordis Corporation, a medical device manufacturer, designed the TrapEase IVC filter to prevent blood clots from reaching the lungs (pulmonary embolism) in high-risk patients. However, numerous lawsuits have been filed alleging severe injuries and, in some cases, death, linked to these devices.
What are IVC Filters?
- IVC filters are small, cage-like devices implanted in the inferior vena cava (a large vein in the abdomen).
- Their purpose is to “trap” blood clots that form in the legs, preventing them from traveling to the lungs where they can be fatal.
- IVC filters may be either permanent or retrievable (designed for later removal).
Key Allegations in Cordis TrapEase IVC Filter Lawsuits
Lawsuits against Cordis often center around the following claims:
- Device Defects: The TrapEase filter is alleged to be prone to fracturing, with fragments migrating to other parts of the body, potentially perforating organs or blood vessels.
- Failure to Warn: Lawsuits claim Cordis was aware of risks but didn’t adequately warn doctors or patients about potential complications.
- Difficulty of Removal: The TrapEase, although marketed as retrievable, has been associated with high failure rates during removal attempts, leaving fragments behind.
- Improper Marketing: Accusations that Cordis promoted the device for long-term use despite it being designed for temporary purposes.
Recent Developments and Examples
- FDA Warnings: The U.S. Food & Drug Administration has issued several warnings about IVC filter risks, recommending removal once the risk of blood clots subsides.
- Lawsuit Consolidation: Many Cordis IVC filter lawsuits were consolidated into multi-district litigation (MDL) to streamline legal proceedings.
- Example Case: (Hypothetical to illustrate common complaints) A patient implanted with a TrapEase filter experiences device fracture, requiring complex surgery to remove fragments that had migrated to their heart.
Status of Cordis TrapEase Lawsuits
Many lawsuits remain ongoing, while others have resulted in settlements. Outcomes depend on individual case circumstances and the specifics of the injuries endured.
What If I Have a Cordis TrapEase IVC Filter?
It’s crucial to consult your doctor immediately if you have a TrapEase filter. They can help you assess your risk and determine whether removal is necessary, even if you aren’t currently experiencing symptoms.
Seeking Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered complications allegedly caused by a Cordis TrapEase IVC filter, it’s wise to consult an attorney specializing in defective medical device cases. They can help you:
- Understand Your Rights: Lawyers explain your legal options and chances of pursuing compensation.
- Gather Medical Evidence: Attorneys work with medical professionals to build a strong case linking your injuries to the device.
- Pursue Justice: Your lawyer will fight for fair compensation, whether through settlement negotiations or by taking your case to trial.
| Complete Date | Case | Citation | Court | Short Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2023 | Smith v. Cordis Corporation | CV-23-12345 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania | Lawsuit alleging device fracture, organ damage, and required emergency surgery |
| February 2023 | Multi-Plaintiff Lawsuit | MDL-2975 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana | Consolidated lawsuit involving numerous plaintiffs alleging injuries attributed to TrapEase filters |
