Kerrygold Butter Lawsuit

Kerrygold Butter Lawsuit

The Kerrygold butter lawsuit centers on a proposed class action filed against Ornua Foods North America Inc., maker of Kerrygold “Pure Irish Butter,” alleging that the product’s foil packaging contains synthetic chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), or “forever chemicals.” These man-made substances are known for their persistence in the environment and potential health risks, including links to reproductive issues, developmental problems in children, and certain cancers. The case highlights important consumer protection and food safety concerns related to product labeling and packaging.

Background and Origins of Kerrygold Butter Lawsuit

Initiated in February 2023 in a New York federal court, the lawsuit claims Kerrygold’s butter packaging delivers PFAS contamination to the food and that Ornua Foods misled consumers by marketing the products as “Pure Irish Butter,” implying a natural and chemical-free product. The complaint argues that PFAS presence contradicts these claims and that Ornua failed to disclose or warn buyers about the chemicals. The butter was even pulled from shelves in states like New York and California due to these concerns, as local regulations prohibit food packaging containing PFAS.

Key Legal Claims and Issues

  • False Advertising and Mislabeling: Plaintiffs contend that Ornua falsely represented Kerrygold butter as pure and natural while selling products contaminated by harmful chemicals via the packaging.
  • Failure to Warn: The lawsuit asserts Ornua neglected to inform consumers about PFAS risks and presence in the packaging.
  • Consumer Protection Violations: Claims include breaches of New York’s General Business Law, breach of express warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment.
  • Health Concerns Related to PFAS: The suit highlights PFAS’s persistence in the environment and associations with serious health effects, alleging consumers were unknowingly exposed via the butter products.

Legal Proceedings and Case Dismissal

In August 2024, the parties jointly agreed to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning the case was closed and cannot be refiled. Court documents indicate that the dismissal was without costs to either side. Ornua Foods has denied all allegations. There has been no public disclosure of any settlement terms or remedial actions taken by the company as part of the dismissal.

Broader Context and Consumer Impact

The lawsuit brought attention to regulatory concerns over PFAS in food packaging and contributed to increased scrutiny of food safety and labeling practices. While the case against Kerrygold was dismissed, it underscores rising consumer awareness and regulatory pressure around “forever chemicals” in the food supply chain. The European Union and U.S. states have been tightening rules to limit PFAS exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions About Kerrygold Butter Lawsuit

What are PFAS or “forever chemicals”?

PFAS are synthetic chemicals used in various industrial and consumer products, known for their persistence and potential health risks such as cancer and developmental harms.

What was the main allegation against Kerrygold?

That their butter’s foil packaging contained PFAS that contaminated the butter, contradicting the product’s “pure” labeling and consumer expectations.

What was the outcome of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice in August 2024, ending the case without costs or a public settlement.

Is Kerrygold butter still sold in stores?

Yes, Kerrygold butter has returned to U.S. shelves after packaging changes to comply with state regulations on PFAS.

Should consumers be concerned?

Regulatory agencies continue to monitor PFAS exposure risks. Consumers concerned about PFAS can review product labeling and choose packaging free of such chemicals.

Conclusion

The Kerrygold butter lawsuit highlighted critical issues about food safety, consumer transparency, and emerging concerns regarding synthetic chemical contaminants in packaging. Though the case was dismissed, it contributed to broader regulatory and public awareness about PFAS chemicals and the importance of truthful marketing and labeling in the food industry.

Consumers and regulators alike remain vigilant regarding PFAS, encouraging companies to adapt packaging and production practices to minimize chemical exposure and ensure product purity aligns with marketing claims.

More Lawsuits