Matrix Absence Management Lawsuits
Matrix Absence Management (MAM) is a third-party administrator (TPA) that provides disability and leave management services to employers. MAM has been involved in a number of lawsuits alleging that it denied or delayed benefits to claimants, failed to provide adequate notice of denials, and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices.
Examples of Matrix Absence Management Lawsuits
-
Hipple v. Matrix Absence Management, Inc. (2014): This case involved a claimant who was denied long-term disability benefits for fibromyalgia. The court found that MAM had failed to adequately consider the claimant’s medical records and had applied an improper standard for determining disability.
-
WEEKS v. MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT INC (2020): This case involved a group of claimants who alleged that MAM had failed to pay them overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court found that MAM had misclassified the claimants as independent contractors instead of employees and that they were therefore entitled to overtime pay.
-
Heckle v. Matrix Absence Management, Inc. (2022): This case involved a claimant who alleged that MAM had denied her short-term disability benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The court found that MAM had failed to adequately consider the claimant’s mental health records and had applied an improper standard for determining disability.
Allegations Against Matrix Absence Management
MAM has been accused of the following:
-
Denying or delaying benefits to claimants: MAM has been accused of denying or delaying benefits to claimants who are clearly eligible for benefits. In some cases, MAM has been accused of using flawed or outdated medical criteria to deny benefits.
-
Failing to provide adequate notice of denials: MAM has been accused of failing to provide claimants with adequate notice of denials, making it difficult for claimants to appeal their denials. In some cases, MAM has been accused of sending denials to the wrong address or failing to send denials at all.
-
Engaging in unfair and deceptive practices: MAM has been accused of engaging in unfair and deceptive practices, such as pressuring claimants to settle their cases for less than they are owed and failing to disclose important information about claimants’ benefits.
Impact of Matrix Absence Management Lawsuits
The lawsuits against MAM have had a significant impact on the company. MAM has been forced to pay millions of dollars in settlements and damages to claimants. The company has also been forced to change its practices to ensure that it is complying with the law.
Resources for Claimants
If you have been denied or delayed benefits by MAM, you may have legal options. You should consult with an attorney to discuss your case.
Here are some resources that can help you find an attorney:
- The American Association for Justice
- The American Bar Association
- The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Disclaimer
This information is not intended to be legal advice. You should always consult with an attorney to discuss your specific case.
