Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow and a prominent figure in the election denial movement, has been involved in several high-profile lawsuits mainly related to his promotion of false claims regarding the 2020 presidential election. The most notable lawsuit found Lindell liable for defamation against Eric Coomer, a former security executive at Dominion Voting Systems, resulting in a $2.3 million damages award. Lindell faces legal challenges that highlight the balance between free speech and accountability in the spread of misinformation.
Background of the Mike Lindell Lawsuit
The lawsuit arose after Lindell repeatedly accused Eric Coomer of participating in election fraud to alter vote counts in favor of Joe Biden during the 2020 election. These accusations were broadcast on Lindell’s media platform, FrankSpeech, and caused Coomer to become the subject of intense harassment and death threats. Dominion Voting Systems also initiated related lawsuits against multiple figures associated with these conspiracy theories.
Lindell filed counterclaims and engaged in intense legal battles over his election fraud claims, including a separate dispute with a software developer who contested Lindell’s election interference challenge. Lindell’s legal team has faced difficulties, including court fines for submitting erroneous documents generated using artificial intelligence.
Parties Involved
- Plaintiff: Eric Coomer, former Dominion Voting Systems security and product strategy executive.
- Defendant: Mike Lindell and related entities including MyPillow, Inc. and FrankSpeech media platform.
Details of the Lawsuit Allegations or Claims
The core allegation is defamation, with Coomer claiming that Lindell made false and defamatory statements accusing him of being a traitor and criminal. Lindell was found to have either knowingly disseminated these falsehoods or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Coomer’s lawsuit emphasized the emotional distress and reputational damage caused by Lindell’s comments.
Other lawsuits against Lindell include allegations of breach of contract from a dispute involving a $5 million challenge prize, and fines for procedural misconduct by his attorneys.
Legal Claims and Relevant Laws Involved
The primary legal framework involves defamation law, requiring plaintiffs to prove false statements that harm reputation, knowingly or recklessly made. Lindell’s defense cited free speech and insisted he believed his claims were true, though courts held him liable based on evidence.
Laws relating to contractual disputes and legal procedural rules also factor into his other ongoing cases. Several courts have fined Lindell’s legal team for submitting fabricated or erroneous documents.
Health, Financial, Social, or Industry Impacts
The lawsuits have had substantial financial impacts on Lindell, including multi-million-dollar damages and high legal costs. Socially, the cases spotlight the damaging effects of misinformation and conspiracy theories on individuals and public discourse.
The legal scrutiny has intensified conversations about accountability for public figures spreading false information and the responsibility of media platforms.
Current Status and Recent Developments
In June 2025, a federal jury ordered Lindell to pay $2.3 million in damages to Eric Coomer. Lindell announced plans to appeal the verdict while continuing to promote election fraud claims. In July 2025, a federal appeals court ruled in Lindell’s favor by overturning a $5 million award to a software developer who had won a challenge contest he hosted.
Lindell’s legal team faced sanctions for submitting court filings riddled with AI-generated errors, signaling ongoing procedural challenges. Other defamation and contractual lawsuits remain active.
Consumer Advice and Business Consequences
For consumers, Lindell’s case serves as a reminder of the importance of verifying claims before accepting or spreading controversial information. For businesses and public figures, it highlights the legal risks of promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, with significant repercussions for reputation and finances.
Companies sponsoring or associating with such individuals face potential legal and public relations challenges, urging caution in endorsements and messaging.
Conclusion: Significance and Future Outlook of Mike Lindell Lawsuits
The legal battles involving Mike Lindell illustrate critical tensions between free expression and accountability in political discourse. The outcomes shape precedents regarding defamation, misinformation, and contract enforcement in a polarized media landscape. As Lindell appeals certain rulings and navigates ongoing litigation, his cases will continue to influence legal approaches to public misinformation and the responsibilities of influencers.
