The MyPillow DHL lawsuit involves a significant legal and financial dispute between MyPillow, Inc., founded and owned by Mike Lindell, and DHL eCommerce, a major package delivery and logistics company. Filed in 2024 and culminating in a ruling in early 2025, the lawsuit centers on unpaid shipping bills and breach of contract allegations related to delivery services provided by DHL to MyPillow.
Background and Origins of the Lawsuit
DHL filed the lawsuit against MyPillow in September 2024, alleging that the Minnesota-based mattress and pillow maker failed to pay invoices for parcel delivery services as agreed. Under the contract, MyPillow was required to settle all shipping bills within 15 days of billing. Despite an agreed-upon settlement in May 2023 of $775,000 to be paid in 24 monthly installments beginning in April 2024, MyPillow only made partial payments totaling approximately $64,583.
When MyPillow failed to make agreed payments and did not send representatives to court hearings, DHL sought judgment for the full outstanding balance with accrued interest and attorney fees.
Legal Proceedings and Court Ruling
In January 2025, a Hennepin County judge in Minnesota ruled in favor of DHL, ordering MyPillow to pay nearly $778,000. This amount included the principal unpaid balance, over $48,000 in interest, and approximately $4,800 for legal fees. The judge emphasized that MyPillow had consented in October 2024 to pay $550,000 by month-end but did not fulfill this obligation, resulting in the larger judgment.
MyPillow’s CEO Mike Lindell noted publicly that the company had ceased using DHL services over a year before the lawsuit, blaming DHL for shipping issues. This lawsuit is among several financial and legal troubles facing Lindell and MyPillow, including other lawsuits related to Lindell’s political activities and separate unpaid invoices with FedEx.
Related Legal and Financial Challenges
- MyPillow is also involved in a separate lawsuit filed by FedEx for nearly $9 million in unpaid delivery fees since 2021.
- Mike Lindell faces multiple high-profile defamation lawsuits from voting technology firms Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic related to his false claims about the 2020 presidential election.
- MyPillow has experienced financial troubles due to lost retail partnerships and reduced advertising after Lindell’s controversial political stance.
Broader Implications
The case illustrates financial and operational challenges faced by companies entangled in litigation and political controversy. For MyPillow, the lawsuit underscores the importance of maintaining sound contractual relationships and financial management, especially with key logistics and supply chain partners.
DHL’s victory signals the firm’s commitment to pursue owed payments aggressively, reinforcing contractual obligations in B2B supply agreements.
Frequently Asked Questions About MyPillow DHL Lawsuit
What was MyPillow ordered to pay DHL?
Approximately $778,000 including unpaid invoices, interest, and legal fees.
Why did the lawsuit arise?
MyPillow failed to fully pay for delivery services per contract, including missing a $550,000 settlement payment.
Did MyPillow stop using DHL?
Mike Lindell stated MyPillow stopped using DHL over a year before the lawsuit due to shipping disputes.
Are there other financial lawsuits against MyPillow?
Yes. A separate lawsuit by FedEx claims nearly $9 million in unpaid fees.
How has this affected MyPillow?
The financial and legal challenges, combined with political controversies around Lindell, have strained the company’s business operations.
Conclusion
The MyPillow DHL lawsuit highlights the serious consequences of contractual disputes in logistics and supply chain management. It demonstrates how unpaid invoices and failure to uphold payment agreements can escalate to significant legal judgments impacting business sustainability. For MyPillow, the ruling adds to a series of financial and legal setbacks amid a turbulent company history shaped by both corporate decisions and founder controversies.
Businesses engaged in high-volume shipping and vendor contracts can learn from this case the importance of clear agreements, timely payments, and proactive dispute resolution to avoid costly litigation and reputational risks.
