In 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Nature Nate’s Honey Co., alleging that the company’s “Raw & Unfiltered Honey” was not actually raw and unfiltered. The plaintiffs alleged that the honey had been heated and filtered, which destroyed some of its beneficial enzymes and nutrients.
The lawsuit also alleged that Nature Nate’s had misled consumers about the source of its honey. The company’s labels stated that the honey was “Product of USA,” but the plaintiffs alleged that some of the honey was actually imported from other countries.
Nature Nate’s denied all of the allegations against it. The company said that its honey was indeed raw and unfiltered, and that it had not misled consumers about the source of its honey.
In 2021, the judge in the case dismissed the lawsuit on technical grounds. The judge found that the plaintiffs had not adequately shown that they had been harmed by Nature Nate’s actions.
However, the judge’s dismissal was without prejudice, which means that the plaintiffs could refile their lawsuit if they could address the technical deficiencies in their original complaint.
The Nature Nate’s honey lawsuit is a reminder of the importance of careful labeling and transparency in the food industry. Consumers should be able to trust that the labels on food products are accurate and that the products contain what they say they do.
Here are some of the key takeaways from the Nature Nate’s honey lawsuit:
- Consumers should be aware of the potential for misleading labeling on food products.
- It is important to read food labels carefully and to understand the meaning of different terms, such as “raw” and “unfiltered.”
- If you have any concerns about a food product, you should contact the manufacturer or the FDA.
