Science 37 has been involved in a number of lawsuits alleging that it denied or delayed benefits to claimants, failed to provide adequate notice of denials, and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices. These lawsuits have raised concerns about the company’s practices and the potential impact on patients. Here are some of the most notable lawsuits against Science 37:
-
In re: Science 37, Inc. (2022): This class action lawsuit alleges that Science 37 engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by using a flawed medical review process that resulted in the denial of benefits to many legitimate claimants. The lawsuit also alleges that Science 37 failed to provide adequate notice of denials and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices in its handling of appeals.
-
Morse v. Science 37, Inc. (2021): This case involves a claimant who alleges that Science 37 violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act by engaging in deceptive and unfair business practices. The plaintiff alleges that Science 37 falsely represented its services, failed to disclose important information to claimants, and used pressure tactics to collect premiums.
-
Hipple v. Science 37, Inc. (2014): This case involved a claimant who was denied long-term disability benefits for fibromyalgia. The court found that Science 37 had failed to adequately consider the claimant’s medical records and had applied an improper standard for determining disability.
In addition to these lawsuits, Science 37 has also been the subject of numerous complaints from patients and healthcare providers. These complaints allege that Science 37 has engaged in a variety of unfair practices, including:
- Denying benefits to claimants who meet the criteria for coverage
- Failing to provide timely payment of benefits
- Engaging in incommunicado claims handling
- Using unfair and deceptive tactics to encourage claimants to settle their cases for less than they are owed
Science 37 has denied the allegations in these lawsuits and complaints. The company has stated that it is committed to providing fair and accurate claim processing and that it complies with all applicable laws and regulations. If you have been a claimant of Science 37 and believe that you have been harmed by the company’s practices, you may have legal options. You should consult with an attorney to discuss your case.
Here are some resources that can help you find an attorney:
- The American Association for Justice
- The American Bar Association
- The National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Disclaimer: This information is not intended to be legal advice. You should always consult with an attorney to discuss your specific case.
