Subaru, a well-known automotive manufacturer, has been subject to several class action lawsuits in recent years addressing alleged defects in their vehicles. These lawsuits involve claims of faulty engine components, defective driver-assistance systems, faulty fuel pumps, and malfunctioning infotainment systems. Plaintiffs argue that Subaru failed to disclose these defects, causing financial loss, safety risks, and inconvenience to vehicle owners. This article examines the background, allegations, legal claims, impacts, recent developments, and consumer guidance regarding Subaru class action lawsuits.
Background of the Subaru Class Action Lawsuit
Several class action lawsuits against Subaru arose as owners of certain models encountered persistent problems such as excessive oil consumption in engines, malfunctioning EyeSight driver-assistance system features (including emergency braking and lane-keeping assist), and defective fuel pumps that pose safety risks. Additionally, lawsuits have been brought over Starlink infotainment system defects, battery drainage issues, and defective windshields.
Details of the Subaru Class Action Lawsuit Allegations or Claims
Key allegations across these lawsuits include:
- Engine Oil Consumption Defect: Certain Subaru vehicles consume excessive oil leading to potential engine damage and stalling risks.
- EyeSight ADAS Defects: Driver assist features such as pre-collision braking and lane-keeping fail to perform reliably, increasing accident risks.
- Fuel Pump Failures: Faulty fuel pumps cause vehicles to stall unexpectedly, posing safety hazards and requiring costly repairs.
- Starlink Infotainment Issues: Software defects cause system freezes, ghost inputs, and loss of functionality, reducing vehicle value and usability.
- Windshield Defects: Sudden cracking or chipping behavior, with accusations that Subaru concealed the defect.
Plaintiffs claim Subaru knew or should have known of these defects but failed to notify owners or adequately fix the problems. They allege breach of warranty, deceptive trade practices, negligence, and seek compensation and extended warranty coverage.
Legal Claims and Relevant Laws Involved in the Subaru Class Action Lawsuit
The lawsuits involve claims under state consumer protection laws, breach of express and implied warranties, product liability, and fraud. Courts have allowed many claims to proceed based on evidence of concealed defects and failure to honor warranty promises. Some suits are consolidated in federal multidistrict litigation to address similar claims nationwide.
Health, Financial, Social, or Industry Impacts of the Subaru Class Action Lawsuit
Health and safety concerns arise from sudden vehicle stalls and unreliable safety systems, potentially causing accidents and injuries. Financially, affected owners face repair costs, diminished vehicle value, and loss of use. Settlements and warranty extensions help mitigate losses but reflect the scale of the impact on Subaru’s customer base. The lawsuits have increased awareness about automotive quality control and consumer rights in the car industry.
Current Status and Recent Developments in the Subaru Class Action Lawsuit
Several lawsuits have resulted in settlements or court-approved warranty extensions, including a notable 2016 oil consumption settlement. Most recently, the EyeSight driver assistance settlement was preliminarily approved in 2025, offering reimbursement for repairs and extended warranty coverage. Litigation related to fuel pump failures and Starlink infotainment defects is ongoing with motions and discovery phases active. Courts continue to monitor these cases and oversee settlement distributions where applicable.
Consumer Advice and Business Consequences Related to the Subaru Class Action Lawsuit
Consumers who own affected Subaru models should verify if their vehicle qualifies for any ongoing settlements and promptly file claims with the necessary documentation. Vehicle owners encountering similar defects are encouraged to document issues and seek legal assistance. Businesses like Subaru must maintain transparent communication with customers, promptly address safety and defect concerns, and ensure product reliability to reduce litigation risks and protect brand reputation.
Conclusion
The Subaru class action lawsuits highlight the importance of manufacturer accountability in automotive safety and quality. These legal actions demonstrate the power of collective enforcement in protecting consumers from defective products and ensuring automakers deliver on warranties and safety promises. Ongoing litigation and settlements will shape the future of Subaru’s vehicle quality standards and consumer protection frameworks in the auto industry.
