In 2025, former President Donald Trump has been involved in several high-profile defamation lawsuits, both as a plaintiff seeking to protect his reputation and as a defendant facing claims from others. These lawsuits revolve around explosive accusations, media reports, and public statements that have ignited intense legal and public attention.
Trump’s Lawsuit Against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch
One of the most prominent cases involves Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit filed in July 2025 against Dow Jones, The Wall Street Journal, and media mogul Rupert Murdoch. The lawsuit arises from a July 2025 article published by The Wall Street Journal reporting on a suggestive birthday letter allegedly sent by Trump to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein two decades ago, which Trump insists is fabricated.
Trump’s legal team has aggressively pushed for Murdoch’s deposition despite his advanced age and health concerns, highlighting the personal nature of the dispute. The lawsuit claims that the publication knowingly disseminated false and defamatory statements that severely damaged Trump’s reputation and financial interests.
Defamation Cases Related to E. Jean Carroll
Trump has also faced defamation lawsuits from E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual misconduct. Courts have ruled that Trump was liable for defamation for false statements he made about Carroll’s allegations, resulting in significant damages awarded to Carroll. Continuing disputes and appeals have kept the matter active in federal courts through 2025.
Broader Media-Related Defamation Litigation
Beyond individual cases, Trump is involved in multiple ongoing defamation lawsuits against major media organizations including CBS (“60 Minutes”), NPR, PBS, and the Associated Press. These cases reflect an escalation from political critique to courtroom battles, showing how Trump increasingly uses legal action to dispute unfavorable media coverage.
The surge in such litigation during 2025 has reached record levels, intensifying the intersection of politics, media, and law.
Legal and Strategic Implications
Legal experts weigh that some of Trump’s defamation lawsuits serve dual purposes: to challenge specific reports and to galvanize supporters by highlighting perceived media bias. However, winning defamation suits by public figures remains notoriously difficult under current U.S. law, which requires proving actual malice.
The ongoing cases against and by Trump continue to shape public discourse on free speech, press freedom, and accountability in political communication.
Conclusion
The Trump defamation lawsuits of 2025 represent critical flashpoints in the ongoing cultural and legal conflicts surrounding media, politics, and personal reputation. Whether as plaintiff or defendant, Trump’s legal actions underscore the high stakes and complexities involved when public figures confront the media under the American legal system.
These cases will likely continue to influence media practices, political rhetoric, and legal standards for defamation in the years to come.